Showing posts with label CREATION.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CREATION.. Show all posts

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Flawed Big Bang Theory and Darwin's evolution theory

Shiva-Lingam-UniversecreationBig Bang Theory Is As Flawed as Modern Cosmologists and Darwin's followers of creation-
As per so called modern scientists, the Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe. The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. Moreover, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all of space was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.8 billion years ago (billions of years taking cue from Srimad Bhagwad Gita – Before 19th century scientists used to rely on earth being thousands of years old, following biblical’s arc theory), which is thus considered the age of the universe based on citings from Vedas.
Thereafter scientists devised that after the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons. Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms produced by the Big Bang were hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium. Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernova.

We Are Taught Wrong Theories on Creation of Universe

Big Bang Theory is False and Full of Flaws
The Somehow Theory of Modern Science extended even to cosmology which Scientists should be ashamed of before claiming to be experts of Science and Cosmology
The recent scientific theory of creation is that there was a big bang, which created the material elements (earth, water, gases, chemicals etc..). These material elements then somehow combined together and created the various planets somehow and one species of living beings somehow. These living beings then somehow changed their bodies and became another species, and so on. In this way the millions of species of living beings we know of were created – SOMEHOW ?!. These unproven theories are backed by another theory termed as evolution, thus one body changes into another and so on.

The scientific theory of creation leaves many unanswered questions.

  • What or who caused the big bang?
  • How earth, water, gases, chemicals were created, when there was nothing to create them?
  • If a big bang created all the Universes and millions of Planets. Then according to this scientific logic, it should be possible to create a small planet or something with a small bang. Can any scientist create anything with a bang?
  • Some chemicals mixed together created the first living being. The scientists have all the chemicals in the world; can they mix them and create a living being?
  • What gave life to those living beings, how they came to know their natural simulation?
  • All the millions of planets are shaped like a sphere, is this by chance?
  • The sun has been giving exact amount of sunlight to the various planets including Earth for millions of years. Is this by chance? Too much sun or too little can destroy all life on Earth. Even +/-10 percent rise/drop of sudden change in temperature cause huge climatic change in Earth. How is this managed so precisely by whom?
  • If Evolution theory is correct – then why not even single intermediate staged fossil of at least one of the species were found by these Scientists or Physicists – that could have shown that evolution lead to species changing shapes.
It is already shown in previous posts that Evolution is/was a convenient way for the Scientists to shy away from logical explanation of emergence of such vast variety of animals, plants and aquatic lives.

Click on the Big Bang image below for enlarged view


Top Big Bang rebuttals highlighted by Michael Turner

(1) Static universe models fit observational data better than expanding universe models.
Static universe models match most observations with no adjustable parameters. The Big Bang can match each of the critical observations, but only with adjustable parameters, one of which (the cosmic deceleration parameter) requires mutually exclusive values to match different tests. Without ad hoc theorizing, this point alone falsifies the Big Bang. Even if the discrepancy could be explained, Occam’s razor favors the model with fewer adjustable parameters – the static universe model.
(2) The microwave “background” makes more sense as the limiting temperature of space heated by starlight than as the remnant of a fireball.
The expression “the temperature of space” is the title of chapter 13 of Sir Arthur Eddington’s famous 1926 work, Eddington calculated the minimum temperature any body in space would cool to, given that it is immersed in the radiation of distant starlight. With no adjustable parameters, he obtained 3°K (later refined to 2.8°K ), essentially the same as the observed, so-called “background”, temperature. A similar calculation, although with less certain accuracy, applies to the limiting temperature of intergalactic space because of the radiation of galaxy light.  So the intergalactic matter is like a “fog”, and would therefore provide a simpler explanation for the microwave radiation, including its blackbody-shaped spectrum.
Such a fog also explains the otherwise troublesome ratio of infrared to radio intensities of radio galaxies. The amount of radiation emitted by distant galaxies falls with increasing wavelengths, as expected if the longer wavelengths are scattered by the intergalactic medium. For example, the brightness ratio of radio galaxies at infrared and radio wavelengths changes with distance in a way which implies absorption. Basically, this means that the longer wavelengths are more easily absorbed by material between the galaxies. But then the microwave radiation (between the two wavelengths) should be absorbed by that medium too, and has no chance to reach us from such great distances, or to remain perfectly uniform while doing so. It must instead result from the radiation of microwaves from the intergalactic medium. This argument alone implies that the microwaves could not be coming directly to us from a distance beyond all the galaxies, and therefore that the Big Bang theory cannot be correct.
None of the predictions of the background temperature based on the Big Bang were close enough to qualify as successes, the worst being Gamow’s upward-revised estimate of 50°K made in 1961, just two years before the actual discovery. Clearly, without a realistic quantitative prediction, the Big Bang’s hypothetical “fireball” becomes indistinguishable from the natural minimum temperature of all cold matter in space. But none of the predictions, which ranged between 5°K and 50°K, matched observations. And the Big Bang offers no explanation for the kind of intensity variations with wavelength seen in radio galaxies.
(3) Element abundance predictions using the Big Bang require too many adjustable parameters to make them work.
The universal abundances of most elements were predicted correctly by Hoyle in the context of the original Steady State cosmological model. This worked for all elements heavier than lithium. The Big Bang co-opted those results and concentrated on predicting the abundances of the light elements. Each such prediction requires at least one adjustable parameter unique to that element prediction. Often, it’s a question of figuring out why the element was either created or destroyed or both to some degree following the Big Bang. When you take away these degrees of freedom, no genuine prediction remains. The best the Big Bang can claim is consistency with observations using the various ad hoc models to explain the data for each light element. Examples: for helium-3; for lithium-7; for deuterium; for beryllium; and for overviews.
(4) The universe has too much large scale structure (interspersed “walls” and voids) to form in a time as short as 10-20 billion years.
The average speed of galaxies through space is a well-measured quantity. At those speeds, galaxies would require roughly the age of the universe to assemble into the largest structures (superclusters and walls) we see in space, and to clear all the voids between galaxy walls. But this assumes that the initial directions of motion are special, e.g., directed away from the centers of voids. To get around this problem, one must propose that galaxy speeds were initially much higher and have slowed due to some sort of “viscosity” of space. To form these structures by building up the needed motions through gravitational acceleration alone would take in excess of 100 billion years.
(5) The average luminosity of quasars must decrease with time in just the right way so that their average apparent brightness is the same at all redshifts, which is exceedingly unlikely.
According to the Big Bang theory, a quasar at a redshift of 1 is roughly ten times as far away as one at a redshift of 0.1. (The redshift-distance relation is not quite linear, but this is a fair approximation.) If the two quasars were intrinsically similar, the high redshift one would be about 100 times fainter because of the inverse square law. But it is, on average, of comparable apparent brightness. This must be explained as quasars “evolving” their intrinsic properties so that they get smaller and fainter as the universe evolves. That way, the quasar at redshift 1 can be intrinsically 100 times brighter than the one at 0.1, explaining why they appear (on average) to be comparably bright. It isn’t as if the Big Bang has a reason why quasars should evolve in just this magical way. But that is required to explain the observations using the Big Bang interpretation of the redshift of quasars as a measure of cosmological distance.
By contrast, the relation between apparent magnitude and distance for quasars is a simple, inverse-square law in alternative cosmologies. Arp shows great quantities of evidence that large quasar redshifts are a combination of a cosmological factor and an intrinsic factor, with the latter dominant in most cases. Most large quasar redshifts (e.g., z > 1) therefore have little correlation with distance. A grouping of 11 quasars close to NGC 1068, having nominal ejection patterns correlated with galaxy rotation, provides further strong evidence that quasar redshifts are intrinsic.
(6) The ages of globular clusters appear older than the universe.
Even though the data have been stretched in the direction toward resolving this since the “top ten” list first appeared, the error bars on the Hubble age of the universe (12±2 Gyr) still do not quite overlap the error bars on the oldest globular clusters (16±2 Gyr). Astronomers have studied this for the past decade, but resist the “observational error” explanation because that would almost certainly push the Hubble age older (as Sandage has been arguing for years), which creates several new problems for the Big Bang. In other words, the cure is worse than the illness for the theory. In fact, a new, relatively bias-free observational technique has gone the opposite way, lowering the Hubble age estimate to 10 Gyr, making the discrepancy worse again.
(7) The local streaming motions of galaxies are too high for a finite universe that is supposed to be everywhere uniform.
In the early 1990s, we learned that the average redshift for galaxies of a given brightness differs on opposite sides of the sky. The Big Bang interprets this as the existence of a puzzling group flow of galaxies relative to the microwave radiation on scales of at least 130 Mpc. Earlier, the existence of this flow led to the hypothesis of a “Great Attractor” pulling all these galaxies in its direction. But in newer studies, no backside infall was found on the other side of the hypothetical feature. Instead, there is streaming on both sides of us out to 60-70 Mpc in a consistent direction relative to the microwave “background”. The only Big Bang alternative to the apparent result of large-scale streaming of galaxies is that the microwave radiation is in motion relative to us. Either way, this result is trouble for the Big Bang.
(8) Invisible dark matter of an unknown but non-baryonic nature must be the dominant ingredient of the entire universe.
The Big Bang requires sprinkling galaxies, clusters, superclusters, and the universe with ever-increasing amounts of this invisible, not-yet-detected “dark matter” to keep the theory viable. Overall, over 90% of the universe must be made of something we have never detected. By contrast, Milgrom’s model (the alternative to “dark matter”) provides a one-parameter explanation that works at all scales and requires no “dark matter” to exist at any scale. (I exclude the additional 50%-100% of invisible ordinary matter inferred to exist by, e.g., MACHO studies.) Some physicists don’t like modifying the law of gravity in this way, but a finite range for natural forces is a logical necessity (not just theory) spoken of since the 17th century.
Milgrom’s model requires nothing more than that. Milgrom’s is an operational model rather than one based on fundamentals. But it is consistent with more complete models invoking a finite range for gravity. So Milgrom’s model provides a basis to eliminate the need for “dark matter” in the universe at any scale. This represents one more Big Bang “fudge factor” no longer needed.
(9) The most distant galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field show insufficient evidence of evolution, with some of them having higher redshifts (z = 6-7) than the highest-redshift quasars.
The Big Bang requires that stars, quasars and galaxies in the early universe be “primitive”, meaning mostly metal-free, because it requires many generations of supernovae to build up metal content in stars. But the latest evidence suggests lots of metal in the “earliest” quasars and galaxies. Moreover, we now have evidence for numerous ordinary galaxies in what the Big Bang expected to be the “dark age” of evolution of the universe, when the light of the few primitive galaxies in existence would be blocked from view by hydrogen clouds.
(10) If the open universe we see today is extrapolated back near the beginning, the ratio of the actual density of matter in the universe to the critical density must differ from unity by just a part in 1059. Any larger deviation would result in a universe already collapsed on itself or already dissipated.
Inflation failed to achieve its goal when many observations went against it. To maintain consistency and salvage inflation, the Big Bang has now introduced two new adjustable parameters: (1) the cosmological constant, which has a major fine-tuning problem of its own because theory suggests it ought to be of order 10120, and observations suggest a value less than 1; and (2) “quintessence” or “dark energy”. This latter theoretical substance solves the fine-tuning problem by introducing invisible, undetectable energy sprinkled at will as needed throughout the universe to keep consistency between theory and observations. It can therefore be accurately described as “the ultimate fudge factor”.
Anyone doubting the Big Bang in its present form (which includes most astronomy-interested people outside the field of astronomy, according to one recent survey) would have good cause for that opinion and could easily defend such a position. This is a fundamentally different matter than proving the Big Bang did not happen, which would be proving a negative – something that is normally impossible. (E.g., we cannot prove that Santa Claus does not exist.) The Big Bang, much like the Santa Claus hypothesis, no longer makes testable predictions wherein proponents agree that a failure would falsify the hypothesis. Instead, the theory is continually amended to account for all new, unexpected discoveries. Indeed, many young scientists now think of this as a normal process in science! They forget or were never taught that a model has value only when it can predict new things that differentiate the model from chance and from other models before the new things are discovered. Explanations of new things are supposed to flow from the basic theory itself with at most an adjustable parameter or two, and not from add-on bits of new theory.

The entire rebuttal section of Mr Turner is filled with contradictions

If you suggest controlling the parameters of Universe and then further adjusting it even by other means of formation of new and old galaxies – then one basic principle of driving force he is missing…who is controller and who is adjuster ? How can it be logical to suggest theories for infinite occurrences with finite mediums and sources ? When there are billions of creations/annihilations of stars, galaxies, universes happening at a time then how can one-logic-fits-for-all work here – when there are endless different and unique compositions of elements, chemicals resulting in each of the phenomena?
The further rebuttals on logics explained by Mr Turner are basics of Science, some of them, we see everyday in our lives and experiments.
Srimad Bhagvatam is one of the greatest Puran which cover creation of Universes, planets, living beings and dwell into even their destructions.
There are billions of Universes, galaxies with trillions of planets – each occurring under unique set of circumstances. A common man with limited set of materialistic features can only subscribe to theories of dark energy and evolution – as it is impossible to reveal such distant secrets of cosmos with limited mental ability, devoid of consciousness.

Now when the above material science fails, Science of Consciousness takes over.

Lord Krishn in Srimad Bhagvatam clearly states that the knowledge which is relevant to earthly people will be revealed to them – so that they move to higher planets with their good Karmas. On the same lines, the Supreme Godhead suggest not to use your mind while researching for things which are beyond human beings. Submit your mind to Lord Krishn and then began your expedition.
While Vishnu is asleep, a lotus sprouts of his navel (note that navel is the root of creation!). Inside this lotus, Brahma resides. Brahma represents the universe which we all live in, and it is this Brahma who creates life forms.

Click on the Navel of Vishnu (Big Bang) image below for enlarged view

Brahma being controller, represents our universe which has birth and death, (a big bang and) a big crunch from a navel singularity. Vishnu being protector, represents the eternity that lies beyond our universe which has no birth or death and that which is eternal! Many such universes like ours exist in Vishnu.
Vedas say that thousands of brahmas have passed away!  In other words, this is not the first time universe has been created.
This cosmic creation is 155 trillion years old – 1000’s of Brahmas means – 1000’s X 2 X 155 trillion years of creations have passed
“The Hindu dharm (Sanatan dharm) is the only faith in the world dedicated to the idea that the Cosmos itself undergoes an immense, indeed an infinite, number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only dharm in which the time scales goes beyond those of modern scientific cosmology. Its cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma, 8.64 billion years long. Longer than the age of the Earth or the Sun and about half the time since the Big Bang or creation. And there are much longer time scales still.” A Modern Physicist
But still to revoke some of the basic apprehensions, Lord Krishn gave great insights through Sukhdev Ji in Srimad Bhagvatam.
  • The total lifespan of the Universe is 311 trillion and 40 Billion years. This Universe is 155.522 trillion years old and it will end in 155.518 trillion years time. This calculation is based on the life of Brahma.
  • There are millions of Universes with millions of Planets, with living beings. This Planet Earth is simply a drop in the ocean of Planets.
  • All Universes have life, are closed, of different size and properties.
  • The whole material creation with Millions of Universes constitutes just a quarter of creation. The other three quarters of creation is Spiritual, called Vaikuntha.
  • During the lifetime of each Universe, there are partial creations and annihilations. At the beginning of each day of Brahma there is creation and at the end of each day there is partial annihilation. One day of Brahma is 4.32 Billion years; the night is also of the same duration. We are currently half way through the current day of Brahma, thus we have existed for approximately 2.16 Billions years in the current small cycle.
There are 8.4 million species of living beings in the whole of creation.
    900,000 species of aquatic
    2,000,000 species of plants
    1,100,000 species of insects
    1,000,000 species of birds
    3,000,000 species of beasts
    400,000 species of human beings
Not all these species are present on this planet. There are 4 ages or Yugas in which we keep circulating one after another.
srimadbhagvatam brahma creation
Satya Yuga: The age of the truth and true religion. Everyone in the world is truthful and follower of the only religion in the world, the Vedic religion. The yuga (age) lasts 1.728 million years and the lifespan of humans is up to 100,000 years.
Treta Yuga: The introduction of ignorance takes place in this age. The Vedic religion is the only one in the world. The yuga (age) lasts 1.296 million years and the lifespan of humans is up to 10,000 years.
Dvapara Yuga: Increased decline in the truth and religious values takes effect in this age. The Vedic religion is the only one in the world. The yuga lasts 864,000 years and the lifespan of humans is 1,000 years.
Kali Yuga: The age of irreligion and ignorance. Lifespan of 100 years, later at the end of Kaliyuga only 12 years. There is complete decline in religious principles. In the first few thousand years there are many religions, which will gradually completely disappear from the face of the Earth one by one. Only the Vedic religion will survive, but there will be very few followers. By 15,000 years into Kali Yuga, 99.9% of the humans in the world will become atheistic. Things will get so bad in Kali Yuga such that parents will eat their own children. There would be no family tradition – the piouness among parents to children would diminish and they would soon behave like animals. Corruption, loot, deceit, hatred, animosity would be some of the traits of respectable human beings. We are currently 5000 years into Kali Yuga.
The knowledge of Science of Consciousness from Lord Krishn has 1000’s of factual evidences found today in the museums world over in the form of bones, skulls, artifacts, tools used by humans spanning into millions of years, further proving that civilized humans did existed for millions of years.
upnishads creationTill 18th century no Scientist talked with conviction about World being round, billions of years old – leave alone talking about Universes, they didn’t had completely translated Vedas at that time to suggest existence of Universes with scientific proofs.
But later after lifting Vedic theories and Srimad Bhagvatam concepts they changed their stance. So indeed, Human race being millions or even billions of years old as informed to all of us in Srimad Bhagvatam, is true.

What Does the Vedic Scriptures State about the Age of this Universe and Humans.

This Universe has existed for 155.522 trillion years and this is just in the current cycle of creation and annihilation. Before this cycle there were countless other cycles and after this cycle which will end in 155.518 trillion years time. There will be countless other cycles. The cycle of creation and annihilation is based on the life of Brahma, the engineer of the Universe. At the beginning of each day of Brahma, he creates everything in this Universe and then at the end of each day, there is partial annihilation Each day (12 hours) of Brahma is 4.32 billion years. Brahma lives for 311 trillion and 40 billion years, after this time there is complete annihilation of this Universe and the current Brahma dies. Then there is another Brahma and cycle repeats itself. This Universe is the smallest in Gods creation. There are other Universes, which are thousands and even millions of times bigger than this Universe.
Within each day of Brahma, there are 14 Manus. We descend from the 7th Manu. Manu is the first man created by Brahma, and his wife, the first woman is called Satarupa.
There is a vast difference between the teachings of the Vedic scriptures and non-Vedic scriptures. The Vedic scriptures are eternal and the Vedic knowledge comes from God himself. The fact that the Vedic scriptures are the oldest on the Planet proves that it’s the absolute truth. And time and again theories of modern scientists fall flat in front of great teachings of Vedas and Lord Krishn.

Bhagwat Gita and third law of thermodynamics about creation decoded Nasadiya Sukta of Rigveda

In the field of particle physics, it has been established by many scientific experiments that the universe had a beginning in the remote past and it will have an eventual collapse in some remote future. In this context, the Second Law of Thermodynamics asserts that the processes occur in a certain direction but not in the reverse direction. A cup of hot coffee left on a table in an office, for example, eventually cools, but a cup of cold coffee on the same table never gets hot by itself, that is, the heat can only flow from hot to cold bodies. The science of thermodynamics deals with “equilibrium states” and it declares that a system, which is in equilibrium, experiences no changes when it is isolated from its surroundings. For example, a system is in thermal equilibrium if the temperature is same throughout the entire system. And in this state there are no unbalanced driving forces within the system. A reservoir that supplies energy in the form of heat is called a source and one that absorbs energy in the form of heat is called a sink. When source and the sink are both at the same temperature, there is no flow of energy and, therefore, there is no movement. In the same way we find that life is an effort to climb the slope that ‘matter’ descends. Matter moves increasingly toward a state of disorganization or of increasing randomness, and Consciousness or Life moves towards increasingly complex forms of purposeful organization or decreasing randomness. These are known as what the Bhagavad-Gita calls as the two cosmic tides of pravritti and nivritti, symbolically known as the ‘path of night’ and the ‘path of light’ or the ‘path of action’ and the ‘path of reflection’ respectively.

And, according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the universe is slowly moving towards a state known as "heat death", that is, a state of existence when all the stars and galaxies will have dissipated their energy in the form of heat and radiation and the whole universe will attain one uniform temperature. This concept of Heat Death is very similar to the Hindu concept of pralaya or dissolution of the universe, and Lincoln Barnett describes it with rare clarity. In this state, the existence of the universe can be described as follows: “All space will be at the same temperature. No energy can be used because all of it will be uniformly distributed through the cosmos. There will be no light, no life, no warmth- nothing but perpetual and irrevocable stagnation. Time itself will come to an end. For entropy is a measure of randomness. When all system and order in the universe have vanished, when randomness is at its maximum, and entropy cannot be increased, where there no longer is any sequence of cause and effect- in short, when the universe has run down, there will be no direction to time, there will be no time. And there is no way of avoiding this destiny.”

Hymn of Creation

This very phenomenon is explained in the Rig Veda (verse X.129) in a famous hymn known as “Naasdeeya Sooktam” or the Hymn of Creation. This verse in Sanskrit describes the vision of the universe, as it existed before its creation. Many scholars and sages have translated the Naasdeeya Sooktam into English; however, I have selected the translation of Prof. Juan Mascaro.

Naas_daaseenno sadaa_seett-daanee
naaseedra_jo no vyomaa paro yat
kimaa_vareevah ? Kuh ? kasya sharmann ?
ambhah kimaaseed_gahnam gabheeram ?

na mrityu_raasee_damritam na taarhi
na raatya ahna aaseet_praketah
aaneedavaatam svadhayaa tad_ekam
tasmaa_ddhanyan_na parah kim chanaas .....

...iyam visrishTiryat aab_bhoova
yadim vaa dadhe yadi vaa na
yo asyaadhyakshah parame vyoman   
so aNga ved yadi vaa na ved.

(In the beginning…)
There was neither existence nor non-existence.
There was not then what is not, what is not.
There was neither sky nor any heaven beyond the sky.
 What power was there? Where 
Who was that power?
Was there an abyss of fathomless water?

There was neither death nor immortality then
No signs were there of night or day.
The One was breathing with its own power,
in deep space.
Only the One was:
And there was nothing beyond.

The darkness was hidden in darkness.
And all was fluid and formless.
Therein, in the void,
By the fire of fervor arose One.
And in the One arose love.
Love the first seed of the soul.

The truth of this the sages found in their hearts:
Seeking in their hearts with wisdom,
The sages found that bond of union
Between being and non-being
Between the manifest and the unmanifest

Who knows this truth?
Who can tell, when and how arose this universe?
The gods came after its creation.
Whether this universe was created or uncreated
Only the God who sees in the highest heaven:
He only knows, when came this universe
 And, whether it was created or uncreated
He only knows or perhaps He knows not?

In this poem an attempt is made by the poet to describe the nature of the Ultimate Reality, and it is beautifully explained by Yogi Krishna prem. It says that in the beginning, the One without a second polarized itself or expanded itself to become Many. While it is absolutely absurd to attempt to explain how the polarization of parbrahman, the One without a second, occurs, it may be useful to make a few suggestions as to how we may conceive it as occurring. The manifestation of a Cosmos depends on the polarization of the One, the parbrahman, into the transcendental Subject, the shaant atman, and the transcendental Object, the mool prakriti. So, far beyond all thought or imagination is that One, Parbrahman, the causeless Cause or the First Cause of the Western thought. Since it cannot be known as an object of knowledge, therefore, “It” is only to be conceived as Darkness. Since it is unknown, therefore, it is called darkness and in that darkness was buried the potentiality of all existence and by the power of tapas, literally, heat or self-limitation arose the Atman or the Unitary Consciousness.

The modern day astronomers call this “darkness” as the dark matter and dark energy of the universe, and of which they have very little knowledge. As recently as February 2003, scientists using NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), during a sweeping 12-month observation of the entire sky, have captured the new cosmic portrait, capturing the afterglow of the big bang, called cosmic microwave background. The WMAP team found that the universe is 13.7 billion years old and the contents of the universe include 4 percent atoms or the ordinary visible matter, 23 percent of an unknown dark matter and 73 percent of the mysterious dark energy. The measurements even shed light on the nature of the dark energy, which acts as a sort of an anti-gravity. This is what the Rig Veda means when it says: “The darkness is hidden in Darkness.”

The actual first impulse to creation, according to the Hindu scriptures, is forever hidden in that Darkness, and that is why even Buddha, the Enlightened One, when queried on this subject, remained silent and refused to go beyond desire. According to the Rig Veda, the gods who were in the levels of manifested consciousness came into being later. In other words, consciousness cannot penetrate to its own root. The first impulse to creation, therefore, can only be called the Lila the ‘divine spectacle’ or ‘divine sport’ of the Supreme. The ultimate root is, however, even beyond atman. Nor even for atman can Brahman be an object of knowledge, for to know It is to merge in It and in that merging the separate “knower” comes to an end. In this essay, only a few paragraphs of this hymn are tackled, as a full explanation of this cryptic hymn is beyond its scope.

Cosmos and the Yoga Sutra of Patanjali

On further analysis, one might ask how could the Vedic sages know the nature of the universe at the time of its origin, when they, themselves did not exist? The late Carl Sagan, the famous astronomer of Cornell University posed the same question during one of the episodes of the TV series “Cosmos” which was broadcast in the US during late Seventy’s. He once took his show to South India and showed how the Vedic seers accurately calculated the age of the universe without any radio-astronomy available to them. They discovered the cosmological truth not by scientific observations but through intuitive insight gained through the process of yoga, as explained in Yoga Sutra of Patanjali, that is, 1) through the process of pratyaahaar, 2) through dhyaan-yoga and finally 3) through samaadhi. Now, let us ask ourselves a question: what is Samaadhi? In the yoga-sutra, we are told that Samaadhi is the process of withdrawing the senses into mind, the mind into intellect, and the intellect into Sat or atman the pure consciousness, the substratum of the universe. In other words, Samaadhi is a state of reversal of creation, a return to the primordial or the “un-created” state. In this state the difference between ‘this’ and ‘that’ disappears and what remains is only the Absolute, the One without a second. The best description of Samaadhi is given us in the Brihad-aranyaka Upanishad, verse VI.v.15, and it says that in the state of Samaadhi, there is no duality, and this concept is beautifully explained in the following poem translated by Prof. H. B. Phillips:

When everything has become the very Self, then
What should one see and through what? Then
What should one smell and through what? Then
What should one taste and through what? Then
What should one speak and through what? Then
What should one hear and through what? Then
What should one think and through what? Then
What should one touch and through what? Then
What should one know and through what? Then
Through what one should know “That”
By means of which all this is known?

It is difficult for anyone to write about cosmos without invoking the name of a famous immigrant, the lateDr.S.Chandrashekhar of the University of Chicago who received Nobel Prize in 1983 for his contribution to the knowledge of the collapse and the death of stars. He has shown that the stars collapse as a result of their gravitational force and the collapse in-turn, triggers thermonuclear explosion inside them. In that process hydrogen is converted into helium, and in case of heavy stars, even helium is converted into carbon and oxygen and eventually to iron, an element, which releases no energy and the nuclear reaction, stops there. Thus, this process of creation, from the Avaykta, the undifferentiated, or the unmanifest, the nirgun brahman and of destruction, or of srishti and pralaya, continues forever ...and without end. To honor Dr.Chandrashekhar, NASA has named its new observatory as Chandra X-ray observatory, which is simply known as Chandra which was put in the elliptical earth orbit, varying in distance from 9,200 miles to 82,000 miles, in July 1999 to observe X-rays from high-energy regions of the universe. It can also be said about samaadhi that in that state the consciousness goes beyond the dominion of space and time. To express it in the manner of the physicists, it is like saying that in this state a person can go beyond the event horizon of an astronomical black hole and return from it at will. We are also told that in his quest for perfection, Swami Ramakrishna Paramahansa, the 19th century yogi and the monk of Dakshineshwar, used to go in and out of samaadhi at his own free will.

In an effort to realize the Absolute through the process of Yoga, it is observed that these yoga disciplines, as described in the Yoga-Sutra of Patanjali, are also given us in the Bhagavad-Gita. Out of the eight yoga disciplines, only three are listed here and are described as: 1) pratyaahaar in verse 2.58, 2) dhyaan in verse 8:8 and 3) samaadhi in verse 6:20-6:23 of the Bhagavad-Gita, and these are7:

1) Pratyahaar: Bhagavad-Gita, verse’ 2:58, says: “yadaa sanharte chaayam koormo-angaaneeve sarvashah…He who is unattached and when like a tortoise, which draws in its limbs from all directions, he withdraws his senses from the sense objects, he is a man of stable wisdom.”

2) Dhyaan: Bhagavad-Gita, verse’ 8:8, says: “abhyaasyo-yukten chetasaa naanya-gaaminaa…He who with his mind disciplined through yoga in the form of practice of meditation and thinking nothing else, is constantly engaged in contemplation of the Supreme attains the supremely effulgent Divine Being.”

3) Samaadhi: Bhagavad-Gita, verses’ 6:20-6:23 declare: “yatroparmate chittam nirudham yog sevayaa… When the mind, absolutely restrained by the practice of concentration, attains quietness, and when seeing the Self by the self, that Yogi beholding Atman by Atman, is satisfied in the Atman itself; when he feels that infinite bliss-which is perceived by the purified intellect and which transcends the senses and thus established therein he never departs from the Real state.”

The purified state, in these cryptic verses is described as that state of cognition when the purified intellect can grasp independent of the senses. When in meditation, the mind is deeply concentrated, the senses do not function and are resolved into their cause- that is, the mind; and when the later is steady, so that there, only the intellect is functioning, or in other words, cognition only exists; and the indescribable Self or the Atman  realizes itself. And this is known as Samadhi.

Coming back to the theme of this essay, the question arises: “How do we know this knower?” This question is asked, over and over, in almost all the scriptures. “Who knows this truth? He only knows or perhaps He knows not?” This is how the Rig-Veda ends its poem, which was one of the favorite poems of another famous traveler from India during the last century, namely, Swami Vivekanand. This shows that the seer of the Rig-Veda even questions the highest knower or his knowledge. Thus the Vedic system of thought is not based on some blind faith or some sectarian dogma taught by a teacher but on scientific basis developed and known by what we call the dhyaan yoga or the knowledge developed through meditation or by the intuitive understanding of the seer. When that knowledge dawns, then the Great Being shines forth through every pore of our being as the blissful or the immortal. Thus, in the Rig Veda, began the scientific inquiry not only for the outer worlds of prakriti but also for the inner worlds of atman, the unchanging substratum of the universe, or the universal constant as we may call It. This Universal Constant proved too illusive even for Einstein when he declared: ‘God does not throw dice’ but after a lifetime of groping, he finally gave up trying to find the universal constant for his “too- too static” a view of the universe of names and forms, which the Hindu mystics had already figured out thousands of years before him, that this cosmos was nothing but a passing phantom show which veils from sight the true and the unchanging Eternal Reality that is forever unmanifest. However, the Bhagavad-Gita gives us the nature of this Universal Constant in verse 2:24 when it says:

The self can never be cleft,
Nor can one dry or make him wet,
He is never combustible,
Present everywhere but stable

Is eternal and changes never,
Remains always the same forever

Maya and the Uncertainty Principle

Then came along Werner Heisenberg, a young German Physicist with his idea of the ‘uncertainty principle’ and with this ‘new understanding’ he stumbled onto the ancient vedantic truth that ‘the subjective decides the nature of the object’, that is, in a mystical sense, “the purity of the soul or consciousness of the scientist or that of the seer determines his outlook.” The same theme is expressed in the words of Vishnu Puraan, where it is stated: “As is God, so is His creation and as you are, so is your creation.” Thus, Werner Heisenberg found out about the maya of the electrons and in the same spirit, Stephen Hawking, the famous astro-physicist from Cambridge University, while intuitively realizing the deeper uncertainty of the nature of the Black Holes realized the Maya relating to the Cosmos and declared that: “God not only plays dice but also sometimes throws them where they cannot be seen”. Thus Hawking also intuitively stumbled onto the ancient Hindu concept of Maya, in the same way as Heisenberg had figured it out earlier. In this context Bhagavad-Gita verse’ 2:16 says: “naasto vidyate bhaavo, na bhaavo vidyate satah…the unreal has no existence and the real never ceases to be.” Now that the word maya has some how crept up in this essay, let us find out what Saint Kabir, the 15th century mystic poet of Northern India says in one of his poems about maya which was translated by Gurudeva Shri Rabindra Nath Tagore (1861-1941) and it goes as follows:

Maya Taji Na Jaay

“Tell me, Friend, how can I renounce Maya?
When I gave up the tying of ribbons,
Still I tied my garments about me:
When I gave up tying my garment,
I still covered my body in its folds

So, when I gave up passion
I see that anger remains;
And when I renounce anger,
Greed is with me still;

And when greed is vanquished,
Pride and vainglory remain;
When the mind is detached and
Casts Maya away, still it
Clings to the letter

Kabir says, “Listen to me dear friend!
Yogis and Sanyaasis are disputing each other,
But the true path is rarely found.”

 The philosophy taught by Krishna in the Bhagavad-Gita about the creation of the universe is the same as the concepts given us in the Hymn of Creation in the Rig-Veda. In the Bhagavad-Gita, the verse’ 2:20 says: “ajo nitya shaashvato ayam puraano, na hanyate hanya maane shareere” in which Sri Krishna declares that Parbrahman, Parmatman or Atman is the substratum of the universe and it is neither born and nor does it ever die. The poetic rendition of this verse goes as follows:


No soul is ever born nor does he ever,
Once coming to being he ceases never;
Permanent, eternal, ancient and unborn,
This dies not even when the body is gone.



Essence Of Parbrahman

 According to the Bhagavad-Gita, verses’ 9:7 and 9:8, Parmaatman or the atman remained in a state of quiet throughout the duration of time known as the Night of Brahma, also known as the kalpa-antaya, with no objects, because as yet there is no modification. But resolving to create, or rather to emanate the universe, It formed a picture of what should be, and this at once was a modification willingly brought about in the previously wholly unmodified spirit; thereupon the Divine Idea was gradually expanded, coming forth into objectivity while the essence of parbrahman, the presiding deity or the essence of atman remained unmodified and became the perceiver of its own expanded idea. The essential nature or the svabhaav of the One as transcendent Subject, here called adhyaatma and declared in Bhagavad-Gita verse’ 8:3, separates out as it were, leaving the other aspect of Brahman, to stand as the eternal Object, the mool-prakriti. This mool-prakriti, the unmanifest basis of all the objectivity, is, from its very nature, the source of all the manifested Many. Reflecting as it does the Light of the One Atman; It is the root of all objectivity and all plurality. If the Brahman is to appear as an object at all, it is only as the mool-prakriti that it can so appear. This is how the One without a second, at the commencement of a kalpa known as kalpa-praarambh, chose to become Many.

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Maharshi Kashyap and creation of universe per Vedic Scriptures

!! ' Brief creation ' Maharishi Kashyap!!
In almost all of our legendary granthon creation creation of brilliantly to getmentioned. Legendary granth ' in ' pleasure sea descended and majestic King MuniShri shukdeo inter-ji pandav tested about the creation of the show. According to themythological granth, Mr. shukdeo inter Muni tested says:
"Hey tested! Now I gyanvardhan you tell about the origin of this creation. Start of creation was submerged in the whole universe. Only God Narayana sits on the remaining sum was absorbed into dormancy shaiya. Srishtikal the time power has aroused the Lord Narayana. His navel up subtle elements similar to the Sun breaks out and the Lotus Fund by meteoric water that has began to Lucent. Enter the Lotus were resplendent in Lord Vishnu and Brahma as artworks. Sitting on Lotus's creation God Brahma-ji Narayan to entire Commanded. Brahma-ji masterminding the creation of determination and their mind mariachi, angira, atri, seeming bilateral ear, paulista, navel-pulah, hand kritu, bhrigu, vitality of the skin from vashisht, Generate efficient and adoption of the thumb while the artworks. Even after such a work, the idea that creation by Brahma-ji is not increasing your body took share into two parts whose names the "and" or "(Kaya) artworks. Those two parts from one male and the other female originated. Male name svayambhuv Manu and the woman's name was shatrupa. Svayambhuv Manu and shatrupa two sons priyavrat and uttanpad and three kanyayen akuti, Devhuti & maternity originated. Manu of interest of creator and akuti kardam-ji made with devhuti. All of these three female foeticide was the creation of the universe.' Brahara-ji ', generated by the minds of later mariachi Sage, who is also known as ' arishtanemi, Was the goddess of art. The divine art kardam was the daughter of Sage and Kapil Dev's sister. Mahatejasvi lad from their womb Kashyap was born. According to the sixth chapter of shrimadbhagvat brahara-ji brahara dakshaprajapati, born from the thumb-ji at the behest of his wife was born from the womb of 60 kanyaen. He got girls of 10 of these 60 female foeticide mane with religion, Maharishi Kashyap got girls, with 13 of the 27 female foeticide, with two of the Moon, with the wedding of female foeticide of female foeticide angira ghost, with two Two of the remaining four female foeticide and female foeticide of Kashyap also made only with tarkshyadhari Kashyap. Thus, Maharishi Kashyap of Aditi, diti, danu, arishta, kashtha, sursa, ELA, Muni, krodhvasha, tamra, surbhi, sursa, timi, vinta, kadru, pageant and became wives yamini etc. Mainly these "resulting from the creation of the creation and the creator of"-ji "creation called Maharishi Kashyap. Maharishi Kashyap, his wife Aditi, of which twelve were born from the womb of Aditya Narayan vaman avatar was ubiquitous on devadhidev includes. According to Shri Vishnu purana:
Manvantareऽtra samprapte and vaivasvatedvij. Vamnaah kashyapadvishnurdityansambabhuv e.. Trimi kramairimanllokanjitva Yen mahatmana. Pundaray trailokyandatran nihatkantakam..
(I.e.-vaivasvat manvantara upon receipt of the verb by Vishnu vaman-ji Kashyap as Aditi appeared pregnant. The whole of his three-ji dagon Mahatma vaman realms by winning on this nicotinic triloki gave andrea.According to the legendary sandarbho Visual tushit manvantara) called the twelve, twelve shreshthagnon adityon wife of Maharishi Kashyap as Aditi's womb originated from, which were as follows-vivasvan, aryama, savita, pusha, tvashta, bhag, dhata, vidhata, varun, friends, Andrea and trivikram (Lord vaman). From Manu Maharishi Kashyap, son of vivasvan was born. Chef Manu to ikshvaku, nrig, nabhag, narishyant, petulant, sharyati pranshu,, disht, karush and prishadhra has the best sons of a ten. Maharishi Kashyap, diti pregnant Convention durjay hypersonic and hiranyaksh a daughter sinhika two sons named and created. In addition to these three offspring according to diti shrimadbhagvat pregnant Kashyap also other sons born 49, Which marundan called. Are childless son of Kashyap. Devaraj andrea has created your God the same as them. Anuhallad, four sons while hypersonic hallad, was the realization of the ultimate devotee prahalad, sanhallad etc. Maharishi Kashyap dvimurdha from the womb of his wife danu, sambar, arisht, hayagriva, vibhavsu, Arun, anutapan, dhumrakesh, virupaksh, ayomukh, shankushira, Kapila, durjay, Shankar, ekchakra, mahabahu, asterisk, mahabal, svarbhanu, vrishparva, Mahabali the great sons of pulom and viprachiti, etc. was 61. A cracking the horse etc. of kashtha Queen animal bore. Wife was born from yaksh gandharvas etc. having been arishta. Sursa yatudhan from the womb of a Queen (Monster) bore. ELA tree, Liana Earth arising in the mangroves was born. Born from the womb of apsaraen Muni. Kashyap krodhvasha of baku by the snakes, etc toxic jantu Queen called be created. Tamra, Eagle, as your child predator birds giddh etc. gave birth in. Surbhi, Buffalo, The two cow and hoof animals utpati's. Queen create violent animals Tiger by sarsa etc. Timi has few species have generated their own progeny as worms have extremely. Maharishi Kashyap Queen vinta pregnant Garuda (Vishnu's vehicle) and varun (Sun of charioteers they owe answers) be created. In the womb of kadru
!! ‘सृष्टि सृजक‘ महर्षि कश्यप !!
हमारे लगभग सभी पौराणिक ग्रन्थों में सृष्टि की रचना का बखूबी उल्लेख मिलता है। पौराणिक ग्रन्थ ‘सुख सागर’ में श्री शुकदेव मुनि जी पाण्डव वंशज एवं प्रतापी राजा परीक्षित को सृष्टि की रचना के बारे में विस्तार से बताते हैं। इस पौराणिक ग्रन्थ के अनुसार, श्री शुकदेव मुनि परीक्षित से कहते हैं:
“हे परीक्षित! अब मैं आपके ज्ञानवर्धन के लिये आपको इस सृष्टि के उत्पत्ति के विषय में बताता हूँ। सृष्टि के आरम्भ में यह सम्पूर्ण ब्रह्माण्ड जलमग्न था। केवल भगवान नारायण ही शेष शैया पर विराजमान योग निद्रा में लीन थे। सृष्टिकाल आने पर काल शक्ति ने उन भगवान नारायण को जगाया। उनके नाभि प्रदेश से सूक्ष्म तत्व कमल कोष बाहर निकला और सूर्य के समान तेजोमय होकर उस अपार जल को प्रकाशमान करने लगा। उस देदीप्यमान कमल में स्वयं भगवान विष्णु प्रविष्ट हो गये और ब्रह्मा के रूप में प्रकट हुये। कमल पर बैठे ब्रह्मा जी को भगवान नारायण सम्पूर्ण जगत की रचना करने की आज्ञा दी। ब्रह्मा जी ने सृष्टि रचने का दृढ़ संकल्प किया और उनके मन से मरीचि, नेत्रों से अत्रि, मुख से अंगिरा, कान से, पुलस्त्य, नाभि से पुलह, हाथ से कृतु, त्वचा से भृगु, प्राण से वशिष्ठ, अँगूठे से दक्ष तथा गोद से नारद उत्पन्न हुये। इतनी रचना करने के बाद भी ब्रह्मा जी ने यह विचार करके कि मेरी सृष्टि में वृद्धि नहीं हो रही है अपने शरीर को दो भागों में बाँट लिया जिनके नाम ‘का’ और ‘या’ (काया) हुये। उन्हीं दो भागों में से एक से पुरुष तथा दूसरे से स्त्री की उत्पत्ति हुई। पुरुष का नाम स्वयम्भुव मनु और स्त्री का नाम शतरूपा था। स्वयम्भुव मनु और शतरूपा से दो पुत्र प्रियव्रत तथा उत्तानपाद और तीन कन्यायें आकूति, देवहूति एवं प्रसूति की उत्पत्ति हुई। मनु ने आकूति का विवाह रुचि प्रजापति और देवहूति का विवाह कर्दम जी के साथ कर दिया। इन्हीं तीन कन्याओं से सारे जगत की रचना हुई।’’ आगे चलकर ब्रहा्रा जी के मन से उत्पन्न हुए मरीचि ऋषि, जिन्हें ‘अरिष्टनेमि’ के नाम से भी जाना जाता है, का विवाह देवी कला से हुआ। देवी कला कर्दम ऋषि की पुत्री और कपिल देव की बहन थी। उनकी कोख से महातेजस्वी बालक कश्यप का जन्म हुआ। श्रीमद्भागवत के छठे अध्याय के अनुसार ब्रहा्रा जी के अंगूठे से पैदा हुए दक्ष प्रजापति ने ब्रहा्रा जी के कहने पर अपनी पत्नी के गर्भ से 60 कन्याएं पैदा कीं। उन्होंने इन 60 कन्याओं मंे से 10 कन्याओं का विवाह धर्म के साथ, 13 कन्याओं का विवाह महर्षि कश्यप के साथ, 27 कन्याओं का विवाह चन्द्रमा के साथ, दो कन्याओं का विवाह भूत के साथ, दो कन्याओं का विवाह अंगीरा के साथ, दो कन्याओं का विवाह कश्यप के साथ और शेष चार कन्याओं का विवाह भी तार्क्ष्यधारी कश्यप के साथ ही कर दिया। इस प्रकार महर्षि कश्यप की अदिति, दिति, दनु, काष्ठा, अरिष्टा, सुरसा, इला, मुनि, क्रोधवशा, ताम्रा, सुरभि, सुरसा, तिमि, विनता, कद्रू, पतांगी और यामिनि आदि पत्नियां बनीं। मुख्यतः इन्ही से ही सृष्टि का सृजन हुआ और जिसके परिणामस्वरूप महर्षि कश्यप जी ‘सृष्टि के सृजक’ कहलाए। महर्षि कश्यप ने अपनी पत्नी अदिति के गर्भ से बारह आदित्य पैदा किए, जिनमें सर्वव्यापक देवाधिदेव नारायण का वामन अवतार भी शामिल था। श्री विष्णु पुराण के अनुसार:
मन्वन्तरेऽत्र सम्प्राप्ते तथा वैवस्वतेद्विज। वामनः कश्यपाद्विष्णुरदित्यां सम्बभुव ह।। त्रिमि क्रमैरिमाँल्लोकान्जित्वा येन महात्मना। पुन्दराय त्रैलोक्यं दत्रं निहत्कण्टकम्।।
(अर्थात-वैवस्वत मन्वन्तर के प्राप्त होने पर भगवान् विष्णु कश्यप जी द्वारा अदिति के गर्भ से वामन रूप में प्रकट हुए। उन महात्मा वामन जी ने अपनी तीन डगों से सम्पूर्ण लोकों को जीतकर यह निष्कण्टक त्रिलोकी इन्द्र को दे दी।) पौराणिक सन्दर्भो के अनुसार चाक्षुष मन्वन्तर में तुषित नामक बारह श्रेष्ठगणों ने बारह आदित्यों के रूप में महर्षि कश्यप की पत्नी अदिति के गर्भ से जन्म लिया, जोकि इस प्रकार थे -विवस्वान, अर्यमा, पूषा, त्वष्टा, सविता, भग, धाता, विधाता, वरूण, मित्र, इन्द्र और त्रिविक्रम (भगवान वामन)। महर्षि कश्यप के पुत्र विवस्वान् से मनु का जन्म हुआ। महाराज मनु को इक्ष्वाकु, नृग, धृष्ट, शर्याति, नरिष्यन्त, प्रान्शु, नाभाग, दिष्ट, करूष और पृषध्र नामक दस श्रेष्ठ पुत्रों की प्राप्ति हुई। महर्षि कश्यप ने दिति के गर्भ से परम् दुर्जय हिरण्यकश्यप और हिरण्याक्ष नामक दो पुत्र एवं सिंहिका नामक एक पुत्री पैदा की। श्रीमद्भागवत् के अनुसार इन तीन संतानों के अलावा दिति के गर्भ से कश्यप के 49 अन्य पुत्रों का जन्म भी हुआ, जोकि मरून्दण कहलाए। कश्यप के ये पुत्र निःसंतान रहे। देवराज इन्द्र ने इन्हें अपने समान ही देवता बना लिया। जबकि हिरण्याकश्यप को चार पुत्रों अनुहल्लाद, हल्लाद, परम भक्त प्रहल्लाद, संहल्लाद आदि की प्राप्ति हुई। महर्षि कश्यप को उनकी पत्नी दनु के गर्भ से द्विमुर्धा, शम्बर, अरिष्ट, हयग्रीव, विभावसु, अरूण, अनुतापन, धुम्रकेश, विरूपाक्ष, दुर्जय, अयोमुख, शंकुशिरा, कपिल, शंकर, एकचक्र, महाबाहु, तारक, महाबल, स्वर्भानु, वृषपर्वा, महाबली पुलोम और विप्रचिति आदि 61 महान् पुत्रों की प्राप्ति हुई। रानी काष्ठा से घोड़े आदि एक खुर वाले पशु उत्पन्न हुए। पत्नी अरिष्टा से गन्धर्व पैदा हुए। सुरसा नामक रानी की कोख से यातुधान (राक्षस) उत्पन्न हुए। इला से वृक्ष, लता आदि पृथ्वी में उत्पन्न होने वाली वनस्पतियों का जन्म हुआ। मुनि के गर्भ से अप्सराएं जन्मीं। कश्यप की क्रोधवशा नामक रानी ने साँप, बिच्छु आदि विषैले जन्तु पैदा किए। ताम्रा ने बाज, गीद्ध आदि शिकारी पक्षियों को अपनी संतान के रूप में जन्म दिया। सुरभि ने भैंस, गाय तथा दो खुर वाले पशुओं की उत्पति की। रानी सरसा ने बाघ आदि हिंसक जीवों को पैदा किया। तिमि ने जलचर जन्तुओं को अपनी संतान के रूप में उत्पन्न किया। महर्षि कश्यप ने रानी विनता के गर्भ से गरूड़ (भगवान विष्णु का वाहन) और वरूण (सूर्य का सारथि) पैदा किए। कद्रू की कोख से अनेक नागों का जन्म हुआ। रानी पतंगी से पक्षियों का जन्म हुआ। यामिनी के गर्भ से शलभों (पतिंगों) का जन्म हुआ। ब्रहा्रा जी की आज्ञा से प्रजापति कश्यप ने वैश्वानर की दो पुत्रियों पुलोमा और कालका के साथ भी विवाह किया। उनसे पौलोम और कालकेय नाम के साठ हजार रणवीर दानवों का जन्म हुआ जोकि कालान्तर में निवातकवच के नाम से विख्यात हुए। महर्षि कश्यप पिंघले हुए सोने के समान तेजवान थे। उनकी जटाएं अग्नि-ज्वालाएं जैसी थीं। महर्षि कश्यप ऋषि-मुनियों में श्रेष्ठ माने जाते थे। सुर-असुरों के मूल पुरूष मुनिराज कश्यप का आश्रम मेरू पर्वत के शिखर पर था, जहां वे पर-ब्रह्म परमात्मा के ध्यान में मग्न रहते थे। मुनिराज कश्यप नीतिप्रिय थे और वे स्वयं भी धर्म-नीति के अनुसार चलते थे और दूसरों को भी इसी नीति का पालन करने का उपदेश देते थे। उन्होने अधर्म का पक्ष कभी नहीं लिया, चाहे इसमें उनके पुत्र ही क्यों न शामिल हों। महर्षि कश्यप राग-द्वेष रहित, परोपकारी, चरित्रवान और प्रजापालक थे। वे निर्भिक एवं निर्लोभी थे। कश्यप मुनि निरन्तर धर्मोपदेश करते थे, जिनके कारण उन्हें ‘महर्षि’ जैसी श्रेष्ठतम उपाधि हासिल हुई। समस्त देव, दानव एवं मानव उनकी आज्ञा का अक्षरशः पालन करते थे। उन्ही की कृपा से ही राजा नरवाहनदत्त चक्रवर्ती राजा की श्रेष्ठ पदवी प्राप्त कर सका। महर्षि कश्यप अपने श्रेष्ठ गुणों, प्रताप एवं तप के बल पर श्रेष्ठतम महाविभूतियों में गिने जाते थे। महर्षि कश्यप सप्तऋषियों में प्रमुख माने गए। सप्तऋषियों की पुष्टि श्री विष्णु पुराण में इस प्रकार होती है:-
वसिष्ठः काश्यपोऽयात्रिर्जमदग्निस्सगौतमः। विश्वामित्रभरद्वाजौ सप्त सप्तर्षयोऽभवन्।।
(अर्थात् सातवें मन्वन्तर में सप्तऋषि इस प्रकार हैं, वसिष्ठ, कश्यप, अत्रि, जमदग्नि, गौतम, विश्वामित्र और भारद्वाज।)
महर्षि कश्यप ने समाज को एक नई दिशा देने के लिए ‘स्मृति-ग्रन्थ’ जैसे महान् ग्रन्थ की रचना की। इसके अलावा महर्षि कश्यप ने ‘कश्यप-संहिता’ की रचना करके तीनों लोकों में अमरता हासिल की। ऐतिहासिक दस्तावेजों के अनुसार ‘कस्पियन सागर’ एवं भारत के शीर्ष प्रदेश कश्मीर का नामकरण भी महर्षि कश्यप जी के नाम पर ही हुआ। महर्षि कश्यप द्वारा संपूर्ण सृष्टि की सृजना में दिए गए महायोगदान की यशोगाथा हमारे वेदों, पुराणों, स्मृतियों, उपनिषदों एवं अन्य अनेक धार्मिक साहित्यों में भरी पड़ी है, जिसके कारण उन्हें ‘सृष्टि के सृजक’ उपाधि से विभूषित किया जाता है। ऐसे महातेजस्वी, महाप्रतापी, महाविभूति, महायोगी, सप्तऋषियों में प्रमुख व सृष्टि सृजक महर्षि कश्यप जी को कोटि-कोटि वन्दन एवं नमन!!!